Unnerving as it may be, the campaign is a great use of technology to deliver a powerful message. The agency is Y&R, Moscow. Bravo!
Feel free to share this post and your views in the comments below.
Unnerving as it may be, the campaign is a great use of technology to deliver a powerful message. The agency is Y&R, Moscow. Bravo!
Feel free to share this post and your views in the comments below.
American Luxury Magazine (from which you can view additional photos) recently sent out an e-newsletter featuring a variety of super-luxurious items. Among them was a select group of photographs featuring Steve Jobs’ yacht. Yet again, creativity and innovation done the Apple way.
A 256-foot yacht designed for the late Steve Jobs was captured in numerous photographs as it sailed in to the British Virgin Islands.
The yacht, called Venus, was designed by Philippe Starck. Jobs reportedly commissioned the building of the yacht after sailing on his friend Larry Ellison’s Yacht. The yacht was not finished until 2012, nearly a full year after Jobs’ passing.
The yacht has six bedrooms and features high-tech automation systems. The exterior is crafted from aluminum and steel and looks strikingly similar to an Apple product.
The yacht is now owned by Jobs’ widow Laurene Powell Jobs.
(Photo credit: Beth Colt, photographer and owner of Woods Hole Inn, @woodsholeinn on Instagram)
Okay, I admit it. I was captivated by the John Lewis Christmas commercial and wondered, “How’d they do that?!”
Creativity went behind the scenes to find out. I’m glad they did.
Love it or hate it, John Lewis’s Monty the Penguin holiday ad is an unstoppable seasonal juggernaut, with YouTube views now exceeding 17 million. One of the reasons for the appeal of the U.K. retailer’s ad is its realistic depiction of an Adelie penguin, created completely in CGI.
In this fascinating behind-the-scenes film from VFX house MPC, you can find out exactly how Monty was dreamed up, created and rendered. It’s full of interesting nuggets — for instance, Monty picks up the Lego bricks the way that real penguins pick up fish — as well as providing an insight into the film’s production, casting and more.
When it comes to holiday TV ads, very few here in America have the emotional ring to them compared to those in the U.K. Creativity magazine highlighted one such holiday ad and I thought it was appropriate to share on this blog.
According to Creativity, retailer John Lewis’ Christmas commercial — the most anticipated ad of the year in the U.K. calendar — is here, and you’d have to be a real Scrooge not to like it. It has all the elements of a winner: a wonderful child actor, a cute animal (the kid’s pet Adelie penguin, brought to life in amazing CGI by MPC) and a heartwarming twist. It’s the music, though — a cover of John Lennon’s “Real Love” sung by John Odell — that gives it that extra touch that might make you keep the Kleenex close.
Like the department store chain’s previous much-lauded efforts “The Long Wait” and “The Snowman,” the ad, by Adam & Eve/DDB, was directed by Dougal Wilson.
John Lewis is also launching an in-store experience featuring Monty, the penguin from the ad, in partnership with Samsung. Kids will be able to see their own favorite toys animated in 3D using Microsoft scanning technology in “Monty’s Magical Toy Machine” and interact with the characters from the ad in a virtual world with “Monty’s Goggles,” using Google Cardboard, an experience created by Stinkdigital. They’ll also able to create their own Monty Christmas card, and of course there will be Monty-inspired merchandise.
As Rodney Dangerfield would say, “I don’t get no respect.” Creativity is like that, as are, for the most part, the artisans and thinkers who practice it everyday.
Creativity is not a commodity, like a loaf of bread or a carton of milk. Those items are commodities.
But what if that bread was a special blend of pumpkin, barley, cranberry and wheat? It would still be a loaf of bread but the process of blending different ingredients to make the loaf atypical (and still tasty) is creative. A lot more than just adding ingredients goes into making this special bread loaf. The baker has to know what he or she is doing, what may work and what may not. It’s a process, and a creative one.
Do they teach that in culinary school?
The art of creativity is a disruption to the normal way of thinking. As a society, we need to be more disruptive, more open to solving problems while exploring opportunities. In being creative, one doesn’t accept the status quo; one wants to change and improve upon it.
This frightens some folks. They don’t like change, and don’t have a great deal of respect for those who do. They don’t understand the creative mind or the process. They merely view it as a commodity.
How do we change that? Maybe we don’t. We can educate and explain, and that will help, but we need to do that with the right audience – folks who are at least open to dialogue, are curious. They may even ask “Well, instead of pumpkin and cranberry, what about pineapple and mango blending with the barley and wheat?”
Hmmmm, a showing of respect for the process?
Who knows, if they’re really daring, they may consider introducing a new line of baked breads. Heaven forbid that the consumers get another choice!
This creative thinking is a disruption to the status quo. This won’t set well with those who don’t want the status quo changed.
Respect for those of us who do? Forget it!
Yet, creative ideas for the most part have flourished over the years. Along with this, various media have caused a different type of playing field to be formed with creativity serving up some new and different rules.
Creative options equal what-ifs. Commodities don’t care about what-ifs.
Creativity lends itself to storytelling. Commodities don’t (I suppose they can but it would be rather challenging). Creativity allows for storytelling to be transformed into Web, mobile, social, broadcast, print, wherever. There’s a disruption in the creative process, and the art of storytelling is leading the way.
You can’t do that with a commodity. Long live creativity. Long live disruption.
We hear it probably more than we should. Is it becoming an overused word or has it attained that status yet?
Yes, I believe “innovation” is an overused word. And, it’s applied by folks, some of whom should know better, who think every creative endeavor is innovative.
I wish that were the case. It’s not.
OK, reality check time.
According to Wikipedia, “innovation” is the application of better solutions that meet new requirements, unarticulated needs, or existing market needs. This is accomplished through more effective products, processes, services, technologies, or ideas that are readily available to markets, governments and society. The term innovation can be defined as something original and, as a consequence, new that “breaks into” the market or society.
So, the next time you change that blue logo to green and make it larger (along with a change of font, of course), you’re not being innovative. It may still be questionable as to how creative you’re actually being.
Of course, innovation goes far beyond a logo or font change. Today’s innovative spheres are super competitive. Just look at the escalating war between Apple and Samsung.
In a recent article by the Associated Press in the Houston Chronicle, the two are back in court this week, accusing each other of stealing ideas and features on their smartphones. Litigation could lead to more expensive devices for the consumer and slow the overall pace of mobile innovation.
The Chronicle article cites Rutgers Law School professor Michael Carrier as saying, “What’s even more worrisome for the effect on innovation is the impact on small innovators. Apple and Samsung can afford this litigation. The next upstart cannot.”
Apple and Samsung are in a league of their own. They share that “super league” with the Googles, Amazons and Microsofts.
For the rest of us on this planet, how should we approach innovation? What should our mindset be?
Well, according to a creative team leader at Google, one should only start looking to innovate when:
– one has totally nailed every best practice and has tapped out on what that can deliver,
– one has an insight to justify an innovative approach.
Otherwise, he says, what one ends up making is gimmickry, inevitably destined for the digital landfill.
One thing is for certain: We cannot stop innovating, thinking differently, and, yes, counting our failures (they will come, ya know).
So, what’s your take?
Agree? – Disagree? – Thoughts? – Comments?
I wonder. When it comes to eating places, aka restaurants, do most folks care more about the food or the place’s logo?
I don’t wonder that much about it. They care more about the logo, right?! I guess it depends on whom one asks. Most consumers probably don’t give a damn about the logo. As long as the food and service is good and dependable and the price is fair, that’s all that matters to them.
Even though Olive Garden, part of Darden Restaurants, Inc., recently changed their logo as part of an overall revamp of their brand, I don’t see that a major reduction in available parking places is about to occur at the Olive Garden close to me. That place is always packed.
Disclaimer: I haven’t been to an Olive Garden in years, but when I did go, I enjoyed the food (at least what I got). My wife wasn’t terribly impressed.
As part of this rebranding effort, I understand that the menu and interior appearance of the place will get an overhaul. Hmmmmm.
Changing up the logo is one thing; changing up the menu could start a revolt. It could also be a good thing. Time will tell – along with the tastiness (and the portions) of the fare.
Then there’s that new logo. Granted, if they were after a completely different look and feel, they got it. What was their thinking, though. There’s no consistency between the old and new one. What happened to a refresh or an update, as opposed to, well, whatever this new one is supposed to be?
The leaves don’t even resemble an olive branch. What happened to the grapes? Olives? No where to be found (unless its subliminal).
Most likely the folks who are in an uproar about the new logo are coming from the marketing (design) perspective. That’s fine. Consumers and Olive Garden fans, however, may be (and should be) more interested in what’s to come menu-wise. The new logo to them may be much ado about nothing.
Meanwhile, I may stroll down the street for a hearty helping of minestrone and some bread sticks. Logos notwithstanding.
Did you know that this month, January, is International Creativity Month? I didn’t; in fact, I’ve never heard of this before. Its notification sort of came to my attention by accident while I was glancing over other “interesting facts” about January.
As I wanted to learn more, I found out that motivational speaker Randall Munson founded International Creativity Month to “remind individuals and organizations around the globe to capitalize on the power of creativity,” according to his web site.
I can understand why he designated January – the first month of the year provides an opportunity for us to take a fresh approach to problem-solving and renew confidence in our creative capabilities.
My only problem with that is why limit reminding ourselves of the power of creativity to just one month! We should be practicing this mindset all 12 months of the year, at the beginning of each month.
Why? Consider this:
As pointed out in a recent article on this subject, businessman and author Harvey Mackay, cites a study by the research firm Strategy One. The study discovers about 52 percent of Americans consider themselves creative, but only 39 percent of Americans feel they’re living up to their creative potential. That’s one finding from a survey of 5,000 adults in the United States, the U.K., France, Germany, and Japan (1,000 participants each).
To me, the percentages above are pretty dismal, especially in light of these stats:
• 85 percent of Americans feel that creativity is the key to driving economic growth.
• 82 percent feel that the US isn’t living up to its creative potential.
• 62 percent believe that our nation’s creativity is being stifled by our education system.
• 88 percent agree that everyone has the potential to be creative.
Time and money (no surprise) are the biggest obstacles, say Americans: 54 percent say lack of money prevents them from being creative, and 52 percent cite a lack of time. The lack of time conundrum is one that particularly irritates me.
Everyone is in a rush for brilliance; yet, the work won’t be brilliant (usually) because of a lack of time to do it. Particularly troubling is that clients tend to accept it anyway or they don’t understand why you didn’t have enough time or that the time frame was unrealistic in the first place! Most just don’t “get it.”
No matter how creative or wonderful we believe our idea to be, a great way to test how good and understandable it is, is to present it to an eight year old. If she doesn’t “get it,” you’ve not made yourself clear. Children are to be envied because of their unbridled creativity and imagination.
Then, as we grow into adults, we screw it all up. Pablo Picasso, one of the most creative artists who ever lived, said, “Every child is an artist; the problem is staying an artist when you grow up.”
One of my favorite inspirations comes from another notable thinker, Dr. Seuss (aka Theodore Geisel): “Think left and think right and think low and think high. Oh, the thinks you can think up if only you try.”
Amen!
Nurturing one’s creativity takes a lifetime. So does feeding that child inside all of us. We need to remind ourselves of that every day and every month, not just in January.
If you haven’t seen or read about Apple’s proposed new campus in Cupertino, CA, this “sneak peek” via Wired magazine will give you something to contemplate. Recently Cupertino city officials gave the go-ahead on development of this new campus.
This blog is partially about innovation and all things creative. When I read this article and looked over the sketches of the soon-to-be “Apple Campus 2,” I began to think of new versions of how that iWord could be applied.
Quoting from Wired, “At this point, there’s a good chance you’ve seen pictures of Apple’s proposed new headquarters — a 2.8-million-square-foot spaceship parked in a verdant man-made forest in the northeast corner of Cupertino. Since the first dozen or so renderings trickled out in 2011, however, we haven’t gotten a much better sense of what all the new campus will entail or what it will be like to work there.
“Until now.
“Apple may be known for its secrecy, but buried in Cupertino’s municipal archive is a wealth of detail on the project — including more than 20 previously unseen renderings of the new campus.
“Seen for the first time is the space port-like entrance to the development’s subterranean parking lot, a cavernous cafeteria that spills into the grassy landscape beyond, and the glass pavilion that will serve as the entrance to Apple’s new underground auditorium — a secure lair where press will gather for future product launches.
“In short, these documents give us the most complete picture of Apple’s new home yet, a campus that Steve Jobs himself thought had a shot at being ‘the best office building in the world.'”
Progress would suggest that more buildings will be developed across the country with the same environmental and creative foresight the folks at Apple are showing with this design.
Architects and designers should never feel constrained about introducing new elements into the work place. Yes, money will always play a significant role, but isn’t it more important to develop an environment that is not only welcoming to Mother Nature, but inspiring to employees (and stockholders).
As you’re nodding “yes,” and you should be, keep in mind that society needs to do more of this. It’s not always about the bottom line.
Now, here’s a peek at the forthcoming mothership. Enjoy!
Recently at an American Advertising Federation Houston luncheon, Hugh Forrest, the interactive director of the ever-popular SXSW (South-by-South West) festival held each year in Austin, Texas, summed up lessons learned from the experience. While Hugh may be looking at these teachings from a SXSW perspective, they’re not exclusive to the festival.
They’re very applicable to life.
1.) If you try to innovate, you will inevitably fail.
2.) Failure breeds success.
3.) Turn weakness into strength.
4.) Patience. Patience. Patience.
Innovative thinking, let alone innovation, scares the heck out of people. It evokes change, and we all know what that means; the status quo is under attack. Attacking the various challenges inherent in putting on a wildly popular festival every year is risky business. You have to adapt, though. You have to appease, as best you can, your customers’ desires and needs.
If you’re lucky, innovation will lead to failure. Then, failure leads to success. Strange thinking, isn’t it.
Of course, we all need to learn from our failures, our mistakes. That’s the only way to realize some success.
In business, as in life, unpopular decisions are made. They’re made for, hopefully, the good of the whole rather than the one.
Along the way, you discover different aspects of what makes you and your organization tick. There will always be areas (weaknesses) that need to be improved until you become quite good at them (strengths) or at least good enough to be acceptable.
Because of its popularity, SXSW has out grown Austin. You can still get tickets to go, but getting a hotel room is just about forgettable. Weakness. So, the event’s organizers are considering introducing a virtual element: Experiencing the festival from anywhere you happen to be. Strength.
You don’t have to be great at everything. Life doesn’t work that way. You must constantly improve, though, or else you’ll stagnate.
And in doing all of this, you gotta have patience, sometimes in rather large quantities.
As with any company or organization that tries to innovate, SXSW is continually learning . . . and growing . . . and failing . . . and succeeding . . . and learning . . . and, well, you get the drift.
Not a bad cycle to be in really.