We hear it probably more than we should. Is it becoming an overused word or has it attained that status yet?
Yes, I believe “innovation” is an overused word. And, it’s applied by folks, some of whom should know better, who think every creative endeavor is innovative.
I wish that were the case. It’s not.
OK, reality check time.
According to Wikipedia, “innovation” is the application of better solutions that meet new requirements, unarticulated needs, or existing market needs. This is accomplished through more effective products, processes, services, technologies, or ideas that are readily available to markets, governments and society. The term innovation can be defined as something original and, as a consequence, new that “breaks into” the market or society.
So, the next time you change that blue logo to green and make it larger (along with a change of font, of course), you’re not being innovative. It may still be questionable as to how creative you’re actually being.
Of course, innovation goes far beyond a logo or font change. Today’s innovative spheres are super competitive. Just look at the escalating war between Apple and Samsung.
In a recent article by the Associated Press in the Houston Chronicle, the two are back in court this week, accusing each other of stealing ideas and features on their smartphones. Litigation could lead to more expensive devices for the consumer and slow the overall pace of mobile innovation.
The Chronicle article cites Rutgers Law School professor Michael Carrier as saying, “What’s even more worrisome for the effect on innovation is the impact on small innovators. Apple and Samsung can afford this litigation. The next upstart cannot.”
Apple and Samsung are in a league of their own. They share that “super league” with the Googles, Amazons and Microsofts.
For the rest of us on this planet, how should we approach innovation? What should our mindset be?
Well, according to a creative team leader at Google, one should only start looking to innovate when:
– one has totally nailed every best practice and has tapped out on what that can deliver,
– one has an insight to justify an innovative approach.
Otherwise, he says, what one ends up making is gimmickry, inevitably destined for the digital landfill.
One thing is for certain: We cannot stop innovating, thinking differently, and, yes, counting our failures (they will come, ya know).
So, what’s your take?
Agree? – Disagree? – Thoughts? – Comments?